FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Gents,
Based on the discussion in the thread here: http://forums.g503.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=291261 about production dates of FSN marked tools, I put together this rudimentary spreadsheet.
I would like to get:
1) others' insight and suggestions about what else needs to be tracked on this document (entries across the top) about these tools
2) recommendations on tools to be added to the spreadsheet (hopefully with links or photos!). Post here on the thread, or PM me, either way.
I know that I've been bitten on the 41-S-1076 screwdrivers. I'm thinking that if we can tighten down a format, it'll then be worth scouring the G and other sources for info on tools marked with FSN, and then trying to figure out their production dates.
As you can see from the formatting of the pic attached to this message, I'm still learning to get slides into .jpg format so they can be posted. Thanks to Wingnutt for the quick tutorial on how to do that!
Thoughts?
Steve
Based on the discussion in the thread here: http://forums.g503.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=291261 about production dates of FSN marked tools, I put together this rudimentary spreadsheet.
I would like to get:
1) others' insight and suggestions about what else needs to be tracked on this document (entries across the top) about these tools
2) recommendations on tools to be added to the spreadsheet (hopefully with links or photos!). Post here on the thread, or PM me, either way.
I know that I've been bitten on the 41-S-1076 screwdrivers. I'm thinking that if we can tighten down a format, it'll then be worth scouring the G and other sources for info on tools marked with FSN, and then trying to figure out their production dates.
As you can see from the formatting of the pic attached to this message, I'm still learning to get slides into .jpg format so they can be posted. Thanks to Wingnutt for the quick tutorial on how to do that!
Thoughts?
Steve
Last edited by gpw_42 on Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:39 pm, edited 5 times in total.
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Rudimentary or not, I'm just glad somebody else is a "chart guy"! Because I needed another chart to maintain like I need another hole in my headers!
Figuring out the production dates is probably a holy grail. Just having a single thread where we can park all the examples (rather than hunt and pecking for them through the search engine) and discuss them as a subject (rather than the tool itself), and where YOU can add them to YOUR spreadsheet (dang it feels good just saying that...) is a big plus.
Thanks for taking this on.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- mudbox
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:09 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Here's an image of a Hamilton Metal Products 41-B-1840 FSN marked box.
Here's a NOS box of Arcturus wrenches. Presumably marked (like the others) on the shank with the FSNs
Early (5 hinge knuckle) Walden box with faint remnants of FSN stamp
I don't have any, but there's an ignition wrench set out there, stamped with the FSN...
Williams and APCO Mossberg seemed to like to stamp the FSN on hand tools. I don't have any examples to share.
-Jason
Here's a NOS box of Arcturus wrenches. Presumably marked (like the others) on the shank with the FSNs
Early (5 hinge knuckle) Walden box with faint remnants of FSN stamp
I don't have any, but there's an ignition wrench set out there, stamped with the FSN...
Williams and APCO Mossberg seemed to like to stamp the FSN on hand tools. I don't have any examples to share.
-Jason
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Steve,
As we dive into this deeper, I'm thinking you may need to modify the column headings. Or be prepared to use question marks in entries or less definitive language. Or multiple rows for the same tool presenting different findings and conclusions. Bottom line is I KNOW we will NOT have consensus on "ERA" for lots of examples. And, it's not necessary to have consensus. The importance is having a place to capture all of the examples and the arguments and evidence either way (wartime, not wartime, early war, late war, post-war, etc), again, so we don't have to go fishing in other topical threads.
As we dive into this deeper, I'm thinking you may need to modify the column headings. Or be prepared to use question marks in entries or less definitive language. Or multiple rows for the same tool presenting different findings and conclusions. Bottom line is I KNOW we will NOT have consensus on "ERA" for lots of examples. And, it's not necessary to have consensus. The importance is having a place to capture all of the examples and the arguments and evidence either way (wartime, not wartime, early war, late war, post-war, etc), again, so we don't have to go fishing in other topical threads.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
To round out the Hamilton story, here is a thread documenting a Hamilton box with irrefutable wartime stenciling and no FSN. Thread also includes an image of the MVMTS from the October 1942 SNL N-19, showing a Hamilton box with no FSN.
I may have already done this, but I will look up the contract number in the WPB Major War Supply Contracts reference.mudbox wrote:Here's a NOS box of Arcturus wrenches. Presumably marked (like the others) on the shank with the FSNs
I have a few that I can snap later, but Greg Hines has a full set on the 41-W-900 thread. Cliff has a near- or complete set. Or Steve can just post his. I know he has a few in one of the most authentic mixed sets I have ever seen!mudbox wrote:I don't have any, but there's an ignition wrench set out there, stamped with the FSN...
Thanks for the prompt. I have a Williams hinge handle and a pair of GMTK Mossberg extensions. Here they are, along with an unbranded 3/8-inch drive speeder.mudbox wrote:Williams and APCO Mossberg seemed to like to stamp the FSN on hand tools. I don't have any examples to share.
Here’s a zoom on the FSNs:
From top to bottom, are:
- the unknown 3/8-inch drive speed handle (4-H-1507-95)
- the pair of GMTK 1/2-inch drive bars (extensions)(41-B-307, and 41-B-305),
- and the Williams GMTK 1/2-inch drive hinged handle (41-H-1503).
I am convinced the speeder is wartime. If we could identify the mfgr, it might help date it, but it's bare steel and therefore most likely wartime in my opinion.
The FSN actually helped me ID the Williams hinged handle, which as you can see, is missing the business end. Someone cut it off, I am guessing after it was no longer functional for whatever reason (e.g., broken). To be objective, I am not certain about the Williams being wartime. It doesn’t have the script underline logo or the MADE < W > USA logo. We do see that blocky WILLIAMS logo on things, but typically not on wartime Superrench pieces. Also, note how the stamping is a lot crisper than the other stampings (Mossberg extensions and unknown speeder). So I'm on fence on that one. And it could help in the long run with comparisons to other stampings.
The extensions with the Mossberg <M> logo to the left of the FSNs have traces of cadmium plating and crude hand forged heads. I don't know if they were still doing that late war, but I would suspect early war.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Click here for a thread on a 41-W-2068 S-shaped DBE wrench.
The forum is pretty much littered with arguments about the 41-S-1076 shank-stamped IRWIN screwdrivers, including summaries of the 1950 conclusion and rationale/evidence that Fred and I included in White, Vol 5, Chap 40, pages 201-203. One instance of that summary can be found here. Our conclusions are confirmed by the findings of a study of under-handle cast markings first undertaken by Viking27 (Hinrik Steinsson) and Hartofoak (Cliff). That study showed that the cast markings of IRWIN screwdrivers with ink stamps on the handle, and no stamps on the shank, and those of IRWIN screwdrivers with no ink stamps on the handle (thought to be ink stamps worn off) and no stamps on the shank, are the same. Cast markings of all other kinds of IRWIN screwdrivers with stamps on the shanks - including FSNs, are different. That study can be found here. (Steve - I would summarize this in the 'Evidence' column as something like "M38 factory documents/IRWIN cast markings".)
To be objective, an argument to the contrary holds that a pair of IRWIN screwdrivers with the FSN stamped on the shank and "USAAF" stamped in the wooden handle are wartime (on the idea that the USAAF was defunct in 1947).
As in all cases, collectors can decided for themselves.
The forum is pretty much littered with arguments about the 41-S-1076 shank-stamped IRWIN screwdrivers, including summaries of the 1950 conclusion and rationale/evidence that Fred and I included in White, Vol 5, Chap 40, pages 201-203. One instance of that summary can be found here. Our conclusions are confirmed by the findings of a study of under-handle cast markings first undertaken by Viking27 (Hinrik Steinsson) and Hartofoak (Cliff). That study showed that the cast markings of IRWIN screwdrivers with ink stamps on the handle, and no stamps on the shank, and those of IRWIN screwdrivers with no ink stamps on the handle (thought to be ink stamps worn off) and no stamps on the shank, are the same. Cast markings of all other kinds of IRWIN screwdrivers with stamps on the shanks - including FSNs, are different. That study can be found here. (Steve - I would summarize this in the 'Evidence' column as something like "M38 factory documents/IRWIN cast markings".)
To be objective, an argument to the contrary holds that a pair of IRWIN screwdrivers with the FSN stamped on the shank and "USAAF" stamped in the wooden handle are wartime (on the idea that the USAAF was defunct in 1947).
As in all cases, collectors can decided for themselves.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Mud and Wingnutt,
Thanks to you both for your help in getting this going. As you've both pointed out, there's tons of DATA here on the G, trying to get it into useful information is the point I was trying to accomplish by starting this thread. I'm hoping that some more long-term collectors will contribute tools to be listed, as well.
I'll email you both the current status of the spreadsheet, in an effort to keep the "sausage making" (messy process) behind the scenes...I've made some changes as suggested above. I can see the spreadsheet rapidly becoming multiple pages in length, depending on how fast folks contribute FSN marked tools to be listed. Greg, your point about likely never reaching consensus on some of the production dates is a good one, which I didn't realize until I started finding some of these posts across the G.
Those 41-W-900 marked wrenches are all different, because 41-W-900 is the FSN for the set, not its components. Top to bottom:
7/32 x 1/4
7/32 x 1/4 (openings reversed)
15/64 x ?/64 (I think 13/64)
Steve
Thanks to you both for your help in getting this going. As you've both pointed out, there's tons of DATA here on the G, trying to get it into useful information is the point I was trying to accomplish by starting this thread. I'm hoping that some more long-term collectors will contribute tools to be listed, as well.
I'll email you both the current status of the spreadsheet, in an effort to keep the "sausage making" (messy process) behind the scenes...I've made some changes as suggested above. I can see the spreadsheet rapidly becoming multiple pages in length, depending on how fast folks contribute FSN marked tools to be listed. Greg, your point about likely never reaching consensus on some of the production dates is a good one, which I didn't realize until I started finding some of these posts across the G.
mudbox wrote:I don't have any, but there's an ignition wrench set out there, stamped with the FSN...
Greg, do you mean these?wingnutt wrote:I have a few that I can snap later, but Greg Hines has a full set on the 41-W-900 thread. Cliff has a near- or complete set. Or Steve can just post his. I know he has a few in one of the most authentic mixed sets I have ever seen!
Those 41-W-900 marked wrenches are all different, because 41-W-900 is the FSN for the set, not its components. Top to bottom:
7/32 x 1/4
7/32 x 1/4 (openings reversed)
15/64 x ?/64 (I think 13/64)
Steve
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
The ignition duty wrenches may be a revealing case study. They were not specified by individual wrench in a GMTK SNL until April 1945, and, consequently, that's the first time the FSN's for them (41-W-1468-3xx) show up in an SNL. That doesn't mean they didn't each have their own FSN before that, but it is interesting that they were specified only by set (41-W-900) until then, that the only examples we find each bear the set FSN, and that no examples with an individual wrench FSN has been found. Based on all that, it's hard to not reach one possible conclusion, tentatively, that the 41-W-900 stamped ignition wrenches are early to mid war, not late war. On the other hand, the Army may have always considered the set number was good enough. And in the KW era, they weren't marked with the 11-digit FSN, as far as I know, only the pouch was, with the set number.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- Tin Medic
- G-Captain
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:06 pm
- Location: Fort Sam Houston
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
A couple pieces from today.
1952 M-37
US ARMY 20955830
US ARMY 20955830
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
.
Last edited by gpw_42 on Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Steve,
Is the bottom a 41-B-305-800? Is it 1/2" or 3/8" drive? Are there any manufacturer marks on either?
Thanks,
Steve
Is the bottom a 41-B-305-800? Is it 1/2" or 3/8" drive? Are there any manufacturer marks on either?
Thanks,
Steve
- Tin Medic
- G-Captain
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:06 pm
- Location: Fort Sam Houston
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Steve, it a 41-B-305-500, 3/8 dr. with no mfger marks.
1952 M-37
US ARMY 20955830
US ARMY 20955830
- d42jeep
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2291
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:06 pm
- Location: Albany/Fallen Leaf Lake, CA
- Contact:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
Here are some pictures of FSN marked tools that I have or have had.
-Don
-Don
- Attachments
-
- Ignition wrench FSN marking 41-W-900
- IMG_6245.JPG (84.72 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- Camillus NAF FSN marked screwdriver/knife R41-K-455
- IMG_6257.JPG (79.04 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- May be postwar as Gardner is not on Wingnutt's list
- IMG_6255.JPG (80.46 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- 41-W-624
- IMG_6254.JPG (100.15 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- Gardner 11/16" X 5/8" shorty DBE wrench
- IMG_6244.JPG (75.19 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- 41-W-624
- IMG_6243.JPG (85.93 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- 41-B-307 Mossberg (Same as Wingnutt's)
- IMG_6242.JPG (123.58 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- Diamond 8" adjustable 41-W-486
- IMG_6240.JPG (85.55 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- 41-W-486 plain finish. Non wartime Diamalloy wrenches are chrome plated
- IMG_6239.JPG (198.79 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
-
- Diamalloy that I believe was made in early '42
- IMG_6238.JPG (74.34 KiB) Viewed 5141 times
Last edited by d42jeep on Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:38 am, edited 3 times in total.
Ford GPW 76344 DOD 11/42 Built in Richmond, CA
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
We might be able to make some hay with this one...!
It is included in the March 1945 ORD 5 SNL J-4 as a 53/8-inch drive 5" long extension bar, with the following spec ref: Type VII, Class B, Style 1, Ord. Spec. TAC ES No 702s. That doesn't tell us much.
But the same J-4 also includes a 41-B-305-700 (3/8 ext., 12" long) and a 4-B-305-723 (3/8 ext., 18" long). Those do not have the TAC ES specs. They have mfgr's specs. The -700 is attributed to Snap-On (F-11) and the -723 to Plomb (5263).
Does your -500 look like it could be a Snap-On or a Plomb?
Please post close-ups of the entire extension (not just the marking), the head, and the drive end.
TEMPORARY DUTY
- Wingnutt
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5029
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:17 pm
- Location:
Re: FSN Marked Tools & Their Dates of Production
All,
If you're going to post examples, please describe the tool and transcribe the FSN. Neither the tool or the number is as obvious as you may think from the photo you are posting.
If you're going to post examples, please describe the tool and transcribe the FSN. Neither the tool or the number is as obvious as you may think from the photo you are posting.
I have two of those, one of them posted above (and a second is in my last flea market haul). Both are APCO Mossberg, identified by the <M> logo. I see that yours is caked in cosmo, but does it have the <M> logo? I am guessing so, as the construction and the font on that FSN stamp is identical to my examples. Please confirm.
TEMPORARY DUTY
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests